Chevron Left
Back to Client Needs and Software Requirements

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Client Needs and Software Requirements by University of Alberta

4.8
stars
3,085 ratings

About the Course

This course covers practical techniques to elicit and express software requirements from client interactions....

Top reviews

RK

Jan 30, 2018

It is very good knowledge. But my English poor for that, was, sometimes. So was hard to understand and catch information. As a result 90% for grade. It is ok. But it is ok.

Viam supervadet vadens

AS

Jun 20, 2020

It was a fantastic course that gives a peek of the real-world problems and processes in product management. It was a great learning experience with peer-graded assignments and the graded quizzes.

Filter by:

551 - 575 of 577 Reviews for Client Needs and Software Requirements

By tega a

Apr 20, 2023

Very educational

By jean d j l

Aug 12, 2016

Great courses...

By Baby J M

May 30, 2017

Helpful Course

By Suraj S

Feb 14, 2022

it very good.

By Ezaden S M

Dec 11, 2020

Great course!

By Sergio L T P

Jun 20, 2016

great course

By Aya K

Oct 26, 2021

fgjhklmhi

By Chanchal D

May 9, 2020

Thank You

By Boris S

Mar 18, 2020

Great!

By KRISHNA K V

Jul 20, 2023

Good

By MAYANK R

May 8, 2020

good

By Ainash

May 15, 2017

Good

By david w

Dec 7, 2016

good

By Josiah C

May 11, 2022

There are a whole lot of terms here. A lot of the answers to questions seemed to rely on minoot understanding of definitions that I don't recall being discussed in the course materials, glossary, or videos. They talk a lot about the terms, but not how to distinguish between them. I still learned a lot, but the questions made me doubt my understanding of what they taught, and I wasn't sure where I could go to learn how to think correctly enough to answer their questions easily. Quizes don't show the correct answers you didn't select, just the ones you selected incorrectly, so it is hard to learn what you are missing.

By Richard J H

Feb 6, 2017

I know a lot of work went into preparing this material. Although the Table of Contents serves this purpose in a more text-rich, visually complicated way - something I would find very useful is a step by step table or guide (to ensure no step is skipped) for the entire process, i.e.

Requirement Activities

Use Cases

Wireframes

Story Board development

User Story Development

Product Backlog Development

and so on. I hope this will be helpful.

By Zeeshan C

Jun 14, 2020

It was a good course for general software requirement gathering. But I feel, it is more relevant when a project has already started. Most often, as a services provider, you need to collect information before signing a contract with the client, so you can prepare estimates and quote a price.

Most clients are not willing to invest much time sharing this information with you before an SOW has been formally signed.

By Kaspar G

Feb 25, 2021

The introduction to client requirements was quite helpful. However, what was missing for me is what to do with those requirements, like breaking them down into smaller requirements and going more closer to the software. Therefore, for me it was a quite good introduction into user stories. But nothing more.

By G S R

Jul 21, 2020

This course is good for foundations for requirement gathering. The documentation aspects are covered in detail. But still, the coursework on analysing, workflow and prioritization can be improved because this too plays an important role when dealing with Dev team.

By Dirk S

Mar 5, 2020

The target group are students without any experience. The quiz's live are made to test your knowledge of the English language.

By German D H

Nov 2, 2020

not as well put together as the previous ones - perhaps you should consider breaking it into smaller, manageable pieces.

By Sheldon D S

Apr 28, 2020

The material / question sets does appear ambiguous with little context to answer questions confidently.

By Cecil R

Jun 27, 2018

The exam questions could have been written more clearly.

By Neha P

May 2, 2020

Questions in the last assesment were quite confusing

By Mikhail K

Dec 27, 2015

Too high level course. Expected more from it.

By Néstor d J M G

Mar 23, 2016

.