Zurück zu Think Again II: How to Reason Deductively

Sterne

340 Bewertungen

•

63 Bewertungen

Deductive arguments are supposed to be valid in the sense that the premises guarantee that the conclusion is true. In this course, you will learn how to use truth-tables and Venn diagrams to represent the information contained in the premises and conclusion of an argument so that you can determine whether or not the argument is deductively valid.
Suggested Readings:
Students who want more detailed explanations or additional exercises or who want to explore these topics in more depth should consult Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic, Ninth Edition, Concise, Chapters 6 and 7 by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Robert Fogelin.
Course Format:
Each week will be divided into multiple video segments that can be viewed separately or in groups. There will be short ungraded quizzes after each segment (to check comprehension) and a longer graded quiz at the end of the course....

TV

11. Mai 2021

I want to thank the amazing professor Dr. Ram Neta, who taught me this amazing skills and helped me to better understand basic logic! Thank you very much!

CW

19. Mai 2019

This course sharpened my analytical thinking. Exam was deceptively difficult but worth taking multiple times.

Filtern nach:

von Edwin C v E

•11. Feb. 2018

The professor teaching the course did a good job explaining the concepts behind deductive reasoning. There are however some minor things that annoyed me:

(1) Some of the definitions could have been more formal. Sure, you can describe a category as a "collection of things", but a more rigid approach is useful for the more mathematically inclined.

(2) Wrong answers in the quizzes are not always explained. You just see "You should not have selected this answer." Okay, but WHY NOT? The learning experience would be better if an explanation would always be given.

(3) Some parts are incomplete. For example, the topic on immediate categorical inferences only discusses conversion. It would have been nice to discuss the obversion and contrapositive inference as well. Another example is the lack of the explicit treatment of the biconditional introduction and elimination argument, while the conjunction and disjunction introduction and elimination methods are fully covered.

(4) The time spent on the course is short in comparison to Think Again I. For example, week 3 contains less than an hour's effort. Week 2 is also rather short. Instead of cutting it short, useful concepts such as the square of opposition, which is pretty much the basis of the relations between categorical propositions, could have been discussed.

(5) At the end of one of the lectures, three links are given for further practice. One of the links didn't work.

(6) Some quizzes deal with material that is discussed in later sections.

(7) The exam was unbalanced. One lecture was about addressing the validity of an argument containing an unknown/ foreign word. The exam had many many questions about this (IMHO) less relevant subject.

All in all: the professor gets a 4.5, the content gets a 3, which makes a 4-.

von Yaron K

•21. Feb. 2020

The course teaches how to use Truth tables and Venn diagrams can help analyze arguments. However the explanations are convoluted and some of the examples are overly contrived.

von Gabriel K

•6. Jan. 2020

Explains very simple things in a complicated and repetitive way.

von Rohit P

•19. Juni 2020

You can skip this one!

It is absolutely terrible and i don't think it lives up to it's title and expectations. The exams are disconnected from the rest of the course, it will waste a lot of time getting through. Yes! it's a waste honestly. Prof. Ram is a nice fellow but sometimes he's just not able to deliver as much information as can be spread in a 30 min lecture. 1 stars for his efforts only!

von Susan M

•22. Juni 2017

This entire series was informative, engaging, and fun, and the thinking skills taught are so valuable.

von Renato A D

•24. Apr. 2018

Pros: I found the content very interesting. And there's an analogy with digital design (Boolean Logic) where F=1 and T=0 and so &=AND gate; V=OR gate; biconditional=XOR gate. Pretty useful content. Shorter 4week course. Well explained.

Cons: The exam is very hard. I dont see whats the point of making many & and V and conditional and biconditional together like a huge formula, it takes too much time the calculation. On Venn Diagrams when starts to become shaded and with crosses at the same time (using only 2 categories) I guess is not explained very well on the lectures.

Comparison with MOdule I: I found this module less applicable on the daily-life, more theoretical (but easier).

It's worthy every time anyway.

von Michael F

•3. Dez. 2017

I am sharing my disappointment of the care taken by the lecturer in preparing for his lectures. He is obviously an expert in Logic, and must be very intelligent to hold his academic position - so I have given the course a pass mark.

For example his use of Venn Diagrams was sloppy. I had already worked out that I could use Venn Diagrams before he introduced the idea, and I had sketched unambiguous diagrams to help me visualize the use of quantifiers. The lecturer just used an X to mark the intersection between two sets. This is an imprecise way of showing the intersection, and he could have easily drew different Venn Diagrams that unambiguously showed the various quantifiers. Also why did the lecturer choose to sit in a crappy little room, and not even take time to remove distracting objects from the desk behind him etc. To me he sent a signal that he couldn't even take time to arrange for a appropriate background nor design clear visual aids for his students. There are other Logic courses, and I will try them and hope they are better prepared and more respectful of students.

von Andrew U

•9. Feb. 2021

It's a pity I have to rate this just a 3. In some ways the course is outstanding but the final test is a lottery for students who do not have a maths background. I would say do the course anyway it is a great introduction but the tests are poorly thought out.

That seems like a real trashing but I did say "do the course anyway" the teacher Ram Neta has a great sense of humour and makes the subject matter come alive with very good examples most of the time.

I am continuing with the other course units having just scraped a pass due to some of the material in the final test not being in the coursework.

von Steve M

•27. Feb. 2021

I found the course challenging but thoroughly enjoyable.

von Engr. K O

•3. Sep. 2020

very very challenging and tasking course. beautiful !!

von Walter M D

•20. Okt. 2021

Not great. The last quiz had questions in a format that was never saw in the materials, so what would possible be evaluated in that case? And the clases were not nearly as good as the first part of this series.

von Robin K

•29. Juli 2021

Think Again II is not as good as the first course. Examples are pretty vague and hard to follow.

von Theo W 得

•3. Apr. 2022

I thought the course did a pretty poor job of explaining the 'dry' part of the course: the truth tables and conjunction writing.

During the lectures, only little time was taken to explain on how to do the questions. So I ended up doing the final quiz many times, just to understand what the questions were supposed to mean.

It felt a bit like listening to a painter talking about how to paint, but never actually see how a painting is painted, or practice how to use the materials and the quiz was "make a painting".

von Cliff S

•11. Sep. 2016

The material in this course is well presented, though scarce at times. However it has its share of problems :

-little to no interaction from TA's or mentors in the forums

-the quizzes are often out of sync with the lectures

-the final exam has severe problems with questions (form not content).

In more detail, on the final exam, some of the questions don't even contain all the content to answer them. They can request multiple answers but have single question boxes and/or the reverse.

von SEAH Y Y

•9. Feb. 2021

Simple logical concepts that are expanded to confusing matrices and truth tables/venn diagrams. I guess one has to be very mathematically inclined to full appreciate the deductive reasoning part but this course should not be for the average audience. Also note that there are disjoints between what was taught and the quiz questions, and there are barely any explanations for the answers. 2 stars though for the effort in preparing this course.

von Tomas B

•6. Feb. 2021

The Course materials in themselves are really worthwhile and easily understandable. I can not give more than two stars though, as the final exam is nothing but torture. The questions are unintuitive and do not relate to the course material or any practical application whatsoever. Sadly, it is a required task to complete the specialization, otherwise, I would not have forced myself through it.

von Allan A G

•2. Dez. 2020

I think it's a good course, however, it focuses more on theoretical things rather than real life examples. I hope the next courses in this series have to do with more realistic experiences. I know that to learn the theory of anything is good to have a solid foundation but I don't see the point of knowing the theory if in the course is not really applied.

von Puot p T

•28. Feb. 2022

all along, it's my wish to study critical thinking. I was first nervous when i saw the "Think Again" at Duke University being offered through Coursera because it isn't free of charge, but when learning Think Again I & II, i realized that i made a right decision and choice to learn it as it had been my wish.

von Carla L R

•19. Aug. 2020

Both Walter and Ram are killing it at explaining this COMPLEX courses. SO GRATEFUL to Coursera for giving me the opportunity to learn from such talented people from outstanding universities.

Having completed both Think Again I and Think Again II, on with Think Again III!

von Lovina N

•6. Sep. 2020

I had never thought about arguments in this way before. It was super confusing to deal with language with truth tables (in a mathematical type equations). But I had fun none the less. I hope to keep practicing and implementing this in the future.

von Humberto P

•2. Dez. 2017

Really good course, the material and explanations are good, and even in some cases, resolving or understanding some ideas is challenging, you can get the idea with a little practice

von Tatjana V

•12. Mai 2021

I want to thank the amazing professor Dr. Ram Neta, who taught me this amazing skills and helped me to better understand basic logic! Thank you very much!

von Mateja V

•27. Sep. 2020

Good course. Unlike the first course of this series, this one is about formal logic. Participants can learn basic of propositional and categorical logics.

von Xiaoxiao W

•25. Jan. 2021

Well, it is not easy to master the deductive thinking skills. I have learned about how to use some tools to make them better.

von Charles C W

•19. Mai 2019

This course sharpened my analytical thinking. Exam was deceptively difficult but worth taking multiple times.

- Google Data Analyst
- Google-Projektmanagement
- Google-UX-Design
- Google IT-Support
- IBM Datenverarbeitung
- IBM Data Analyst
- IBM-Datenanalyse mit Excel und R
- IBM Cybersecurity Analyst
- IBM Data Engineering
- IBM Full Stack-Cloudentwickler
- Facebook Social Media Marketing
- Facebook Marketinganalyse
- Salesforce Sales Development Representative
- Sales Operations in Salesforce
- Buchhaltung mit Intuit
- Vorbereitung auf die Google Cloud-Zertifizierung: Cloud Architect
- Vorbereitung auf die Google Cloud-Zertifizierung: Cloud Data Engineer
- Eine Karriere starten
- Auf eine Zertifizierung vorbereiten
- Bringen Sie Ihre Karriere voran

- Kostenlose Kurse
- Lernen Sie eine Sprache
- Python
- Java
- Webdesign
- SQL
- Gratiskurse
- Microsoft Excel
- Projektmanagement
- Cybersicherheit
- Personalwesen
- Kostenlose Kurse in Datenverarbeitung
- Englisch sprechen
- Inhalte verfassen
- Full-Stack-Webentwicklung
- Künstliche Intelligenz
- C-Programmierung
- Kommunikationsfähigkeiten
- Blockchain
- Alle Kurse anzeigen

- Kompetenzen für Datenwissenschaftsteams
- Datengestützte Entscheidungsfindung
- Kompetenzen im Bereich Software Engineering
- Soft Skills für Ingenieurteams
- Management-Kompetenzen
- Marketing-Kompetenzen
- Kompetenzen für Vertriebsteams
- Produktmanager-Kompetenzen
- Kompetenzen im Bereich Finanzen
- Beliebte Kurse in Datenverarbeitung im Vereinigten Königreich
- Beliebte Technologiekurse in Deutschland
- Beliebte Zertifizierungen für Cybersicherheit
- Beliebte IT-Zertifizierungen
- Beliebte SQL-Zertifizierungen
- Karriereleitfaden für Marketing-Manager
- Karriereleitfaden für Projektmanager
- Python-Programmierkenntnisse
- Karriereleitfaden für Webentwickler
- Datenanalysefähigkeiten
- Kompetenzen für UX-Designer

- MasterTrack® Certificates
- Zertifikate über berufliche Qualifikation
- Universitätszertifikate
- MBA- und Business-Abschlüsse
- Abschlüsse in Data Science
- Abschlüsse in Informatik
- Abschlüsse in Datenanalyse
- Abschlüsse im Gesundheitswesen
- Abschlüsse in Sozialwissenschaften
- Management-Abschlüsse
- Abschlüsse von europäischen Spitzenuniversitäten
- Masterabschlüsse
- Bachelorabschlüsse
- Studiengänge mit Performance Pathway
- BSc-Kurse
- Was ist ein Bachelorabschluss?
- Wie lange dauert ein Masterstudium?
- Lohnt sich ein Online-MBA?
- 7 Finanzierungsmöglichkeiten für die Graduate School
- Alle Zertifikate anzeigen