Material is excellent and very interesting. Test questions can be confusing and poorly phrased.

Very enjoyable however, I feel that Quiz Three needs to be looked over for software problems.

Very interesting and passionating course even for people who are new to linguistic.

It is a great introduction course, covering every aspect related to linguistics.

First course tried.. succeeded! Very informative and nice to work on! Thank you

The content was good, but could go a bit deeper into each of the subtopics.

Interesting course, I've learned a lot of things about studying languages.

some problems in quiz part are confusing... but nice course in general

An eye-opener and a game changer course to understand humanity.

great course. Great refresher 30 years after college.

One of the most brilliant courses I have ever taken!

Wide-angle, general introductory course. Engaging.

Interesting content, but still a bit buggy...

Good course, nice teachers, good material

The interview with Chomsky a real treat.

This was a great introductory course.

Very interesting course! Thank you!

Great introduction to linguistics.

тяжко было, но в целом интересно

lots of interesting information

101 linguistics

great course!

很好best

Interesting course. It's difficult to cover everything in such a short course. The last two weeks' classes have not much to do with "miracles" of languages. I would say these things are common to all languages. I would have preferred to concentrate more on firs 4 weeks topics. This all stuff with politeness does not fit much in the topic. It's more sociolinguistics, cultural studies etc. And there is not much to learn. There is no much valuable information to remember. I liked more the beginning about sounds, typology of languages etc. This all stuff with positive and negative face was a little strange. Specially, it was difficult to do the tests with these "faces". Listening exercises were quite OK, but for instance to decode Chinese without transcription was impossible task. All these exercises with language mistakes was also strange. If we all do pronunciation mistakes in all languages what’s the point to study these mistakes? What's the point to see what mistake is made in Basque, Gungbe or any other language? I saw this exercise as pure waste of my time. So, my general suggestion would be to concentrate on pure linguistic things (first 4 weeks) and do not go into field of sociology, neuro or psycholinguistics. BTW this couple of students is not balanced because the young man dominates all discussions. The girl should be more active or the man less active.

Too difficult for an introductory course. Ambiguous information. Time estimates are way off. Not what I expected. Rather provincial in its approach. Guess I'm just not cut out to be a linguist. Answers to the tests are not available or derivable from the lectures and required readings. I've read a lot of articles and books, particularly about neurolinguistics and the intersection between linguistics and genomics and the information in the course does not really assist with understanding what I've been reading, though I can sort of see how the authors might have made use of some of the things presented here. The interview with Chomsky was particularly useless.