Chevron Left
Zurück zu Introduction to Genomic Technologies

Kursteilnehmer-Bewertung und -Feedback für Introduction to Genomic Technologies von Johns Hopkins University

4.6
Sterne
3,104 Bewertungen
494 Bewertungen

Über den Kurs

This course introduces you to the basic biology of modern genomics and the experimental tools that we use to measure it. We'll introduce the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology and cover how next-generation sequencing can be used to measure DNA, RNA, and epigenetic patterns. You'll also get an introduction to the key concepts in computing and data science that you'll need to understand how data from next-generation sequencing experiments are generated and analyzed. This is the first course in the Genomic Data Science Specialization....

Top-Bewertungen

SS
27. Mai 2020

It was well taught. I liked the fact the two professors focused on two different subjects- biology and statistics portion of this course. The paragraphs written below each video was extremely helpful.

KK
20. Nov. 2017

Relatively nice introduction course, contents are maybe rather limited, yet as an instructive course, it does provide a clear overview which correlates well with the required answers for the quizzes!

Filtern nach:

426 - 450 von 490 Bewertungen für Introduction to Genomic Technologies

von TAN J Y

12. Juni 2020

Week 4's content is not well oriented.

von Ankit N

19. Aug. 2019

Excellent start to the bigger concept.

von Bethany S

25. Jan. 2020

Good intro to genomic data science

von Charl W K

10. Feb. 2016

Comprehensive cover of the basics.

von Nimesh B

8. Juni 2020

Best process and way of learning.

von Dmitry S

11. Apr. 2016

nice! Stats review particularly

von Kwon S H

3. Juli 2020

Concise and easy to understand

von Luis O C L

4. Okt. 2017

Basic but really necessary

von 王宪赓

11. Dez. 2016

Great introductory course!

von Theodoulakis C

31. Aug. 2019

Good introductory course

von Nur H B G

24. Juni 2020

Perfect for beginners!

von Sathya P

19. Okt. 2017

Very nice basic course

von Hendy Z

11. Dez. 2016

a great way to start.

von Andrea S

16. Mai 2018

a great introduction

von Jean P M R

11. Aug. 2016

Good Introduction!!!

von Paddy M

9. März 2018

Great Introduction.

von Rana M A

23. Jan. 2017

Good for debutants

von MOHAMMAD S A

5. Sep. 2020

Great experience

von rupal k

1. Juli 2020

very effective

von Weidong X

30. Juli 2016

good course.

von hzl

13. Jan. 2017

good course

von Nikhil Y

26. Apr. 2020

amazing!!

von Ayesha A

30. Sep. 2020

Good 1

von Piotr G

8. Juni 2020

The initial lectures on introduction to genomics are very engaging and good starting point for everyone who slightly touched that topic before and is interested in both history and recent developments in the area.

The week focusing on software engineering doesn't seem to be a good fit for such training. Most of the content is dedicated to extremely trivial computer science topics hardly related with bioinformatics. Only last several minutes give examples of bioIT software and systems.

The week with statistics is good only if you posses solid knowledge on statistics. Then it serves as a good recap. Otherwise you might be completely lost 5 min into the content, e.g. there are much better explanations of p-value and family-wise error out there in internet than the one provided in the course.

The idea of a project to go through a research paper and answer the questions about it was fantastic! Very good way to cement what you learned.

Overall: 3 stars. I would give 4 if not for trivial and rather useless computer science intro. At few points, the pace should be adjusted (e.g. statistics).

von Alejandro M

28. Apr. 2020

There are two lecturers on this course, Steven and Jeff. The lectures by Steven are amazing. They are extremely interesting, clear, structured, concise and pedagogical. Seriously, great, I learned a lot and I would give Steven 5 stars. Unfortunately, the lectures by Jeff are unclear, filled with jargon (undefined and unexplained terms) and statements which are imprecise at best and incorrect at worse. Verdecit: 1 star for this second lecturer who didn't consider that the audience he was addressing was broad, and probably didn't take enough time to prepare his lectures. Average result: 3 stars.