Kursteilnehmer-Bewertung und -Feedback für Managing as a Coach von University of California, Davis
Über den Kurs
Top-Bewertungen
EM
Nov 18, 2017
A great course for the beginners. The videos are short and easy to comprehend. The slides can be downloaded in PDF - i find it very convenient as i can share some of those slides with my colleagues.
SV
Jun 28, 2016
This Course is Excellent, bu all means.\n\nTeaches the Nuances of all the Roles: Leader, Manager, Mentor, Trainer and Coach.\n\nThe Trainer Kris Plachyis awesome. Excellent Delivery Skills.
176 - 183 von 183 Bewertungen für Managing as a Coach
von Mark L
•Dec 30, 2016
The course was overwrought in general - seemed like it could have been accomplished in four weeks instead of five. The instructor was clear most of the time, but there were places were the concepts were unclear, probably 80 percent was on target. This might explain the inconsistent grading of written assignments. Needs some fine tuning, but worth the time.
von Mark J
•May 23, 2018
This course seems to split a lot of hairs for very little benefit: Is XYZ a Circumstance (fact), Action (also a fact), or Result (also a fact). Is it a thought or a feeling? but "I'm feeling overwhelmed" is a thought. While being able to tell the difference between a fact and a feeling is a good thing, trying to split some hairs is just consultant speak for give me a lot of money to confuse you. The videos of the leader of linked in give more substance than part 3 of this course.
To some degree, some of what she is trying do is convince use the King's new clothes are beautiful, but some of it is just bluster without substance.
Does she believe what she is teaching? Maybe, but she seems to worry more about definitions than substance
von Hiran N
•Sep 12, 2018
Expected a more in depth knowledge on Coaching.
von Gergely S
•Nov 21, 2018
Most of it was for beginners. Thought model is interesting, the rest was too high level, that should not be new to a manager.
von 柯安丽
•Mar 23, 2019
Very easy, just a model: circumstance- thought-feeling-action-result; not challenging enough
von Novosiadlyi V
•May 03, 2016
This course feels quite weak, especially for the paid course, for these reasons:
Models (Leader as Mentor, Coach, etc..., CTFAR model), which are given in this course, are given as is, with no references on how they were developed, authorship, and how good the results of application are.
Almost no (just one) external references for reading to better understanding course material.
The amount of material (about 3 hours of video, 4 quizzes, 2 discussions and 1 assignment) doesn't feel like it's a month's course, more like a one/one-and-a-half week.
No references on topics, described as "hard" during the course (for example, identifying your values), which would make this topics less "hard".
No instructor interaction on the course forum (I don't know if this should be like this or not, but it still feels bad).
However, the final assignment is good and practice oriented.
von Bonnie S
•Jan 17, 2019
The course had some good information and I was interested in the material but did not want to wait a month to get a paper graded in order to move to the next section.
von Michael B
•Aug 13, 2018
While the Facilitator may be knowledgeable, the course has a HORRIBLE format. The Facilitator often giggles during the presentation which MIGHT work if this was a LIVE presentation. Also she uses of the phrase "a lot" frequently and that detracts greatly from the value of the course.
Introductory portions are poorly produced with background music that is louder than the Facilitator.
The course CONTENT is good, and is very helpful.
