Kursteilnehmer-Bewertung und -Feedback für Positive Psychology: Martin E. P. Seligman’s Visionary Science von University of Pennsylvania
Über den Kurs
Top-Bewertungen
Excellent and succint explanation of the history, objectives, trends and branches of Positive Psychology. And to learn with the man himself and other leading researchers is a one-of-a-kind experience.
Very self-enhancing. Activities are fun and at the same time a good avenue for learning experiences. Very positive and student engaging. Thank you for giving me the chance to be part of this course =)
1326 - 1350 von 1,373 Bewertungen für Positive Psychology: Martin E. P. Seligman’s Visionary Science
von Liew L Y
•It's very interesting topic to bring into awareness. Highly recommended!
von Verinder S
•Informative. But, I had expected more depth since I had read his books.
von Agnieszka S
•Visionary and inspiring knowledge. Gives the appetite to learn more!
von Maya P
•Very good. I just wish that there were more hours and assignments.
von Vinay J
•A course that leaves an impact long after its completion!!
von Anthony K
•The key skill I take-away from this course i OPTIMISM and
von Kathryn L W
•Good information but not very applicable to daily life.
von Carey N G
•It was great and Dr. Seligman is a great professor!
von BacHa B
•This is a good course. I find it very practical.
von Li H
•Excellent course. Give me more inspiration.
von Fiza I
•this was a good and interesting course
von Kartik B
•Sets foundation for future courses
von Timothy G R
•Great content. Easy to navigate.
von Manoj K S
•very good study guidance
von Anthony P
•Interesting content
von Juanhao Z
•very helpful course
von Shary F
•an eye opener
von Mikhail T
•it was great
von hana l
•its so good
von Polina B
•Advantages:
1) I liked the idea of filming the lectures of Dr Seligman in the real class. Watching his videos, I felt like I was sitting is the lecture room with other students.
2) I also enjoyed watching different researchers talking about their fields of study. Inviting different speakers makes the course more diverse.
Areas of improvement:
1) Design. Some of the presentations in the videos were not in the style of the course (e.g. videos on constructive journalism)
2) Structure. The overall impression is that different parts of the course were not reconciled with each other, leading to fragmentation of the course. It concerns not only design, but also video lenght (for example videos on constructive journalism were way too long) and lack of a sigle thread going through all the videos and supplementary materials. It seems that the course has been made in a hurry.
von Micah K
•As an introduction to positive psychology, the course material did seem a bit random. The topics covered were certainly interesting, but as they exclusively reflected the interests and activities of Marty Seligman and his Post-Docs at UPenn, the course provided a somewhat skewed sample of information that was a bit odd to present in an introductory course. Also many of the technical details were off. Quiz questions were repeated, sections of videos were cut off at random, and the time estimates were often way off. Having said all of that, I did learn a lot!
von Ernie D
•The course is an easy introduction to positive psychology. I found the addition of post-doc and experts to be disjointed and that they could have been introduced better. Context as to why these experts were part of the course would help. I also feel the course lacked an overall structure, power point slides, and more good quiz questions. The activities were helpful and I have incorporated them into my life.
von Yashowardhan C
•The course was way too basic.
Maybe, few more papers, names of books, articles could be shared.
I was specially bored of Constructive Journalism and Spirituality bit.
I loved all of Seligman's sessions, Big data in Psychology, Resilience and Open Experience bits.
May be include more Profs in the course - Barbara Fredrickson, Tal Ben-Shahar, Shaun Achor, Angela Duckworth and the like.
von Amy K
•The first two weeks were excellent because they provided valuable information about the basic concepts of Positive Psychology. As the course continued, I felt it moved away from these basics into related topics that themselves could be specific courses. Additionally, we heard from other speakers but I wanted my teacher to be primarily Martin Seligman.
von Subhasis C
•My rating is not for the course but the course price. I had to pay for the entire specialisation to just take this one course. Dr. Seligman should see that his course at least here, is affordable. That would be philanthropy and not force people to pay for the entire specialisation.
Coursera Footer
