Bewertung und Feedback des Lernenden für Programming Languages, Part C von University of Washington
Über den Kurs
Top-Bewertungen
SS
7. Jan. 2019
Great course, nicely rounded off the discussions from previous parts. Really puts OOP style programming in context and nicely contrasts it from the functional programming concepts. Highly recommended!
JH
26. Dez. 2016
I took this course about 10 years off the college, and it was excellent refresher on the topics I don't use on a daily basis. Absolutely great lecturer, great videos and study materials!
76 - 85 von 85 Bewertungen für Programming Languages, Part C
von pffy233
•20. Nov. 2016
excellence experience
von Kevin X
•19. Dez. 2016
Really impressive!
von 郑
•10. Jan. 2018
very good course!
von Sam R
•11. Jan. 2019
Fantastic course
von Morton L
•4. Apr. 2020
Great course.
von Alejandro M
•17. Dez. 2016
Excellent!
von jani k
•28. März 2018
exellent
von Abdifatah A
•19. Dez. 2017
great!!
von UmbraSeven
•28. Sep. 2017
Great!
von Brandon C I
•7. März 2020
Again, great course - I was a little bit shaky on the Ruby, but to be honest this was my first real dive into what OOP is "really like" (as far as I can tell). I was also impressed by how certain important concepts from Part B were also tested towards the end (e.g., streams). I also enjoyed the material on subtyping towards the end; it makes you actually want to be interested in implementing a small language like that someday. The only caveat I must mention (and what the missing star is due to) is that, I had a little trouble on my Linux machine getting a version of Tcl/Tk to work with my installation of Ruby, since Ruby doesn't accept the latest (packaged) version of Tcl/Tk. I also had trouble with Jruby, and in the end opted to manually install older versions of Tcl and Tk. But I think the Tetris experience was worth it :) That whole little sidetrack actually also turned me on to the possibility of how PLs use graphics libraries in general, so let's see where that leads...
Coursera Footer
