Chevron Left
Zurück zu Technical Writing

Kursteilnehmer-Bewertung und -Feedback für Technical Writing von Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology

4.5
Sterne
114 Bewertungen
32 Bewertungen

Über den Kurs

The course develops technical writing skills necessary to communicate information gained through a process of technical or experimental work. The course highlights the factors that determine the degree of technicality of the language and concepts involved. You will learn how to write different technical reports, e.g., laboratory reports, research reports, design and feasibility reports, progress reports, consulting reports, etc. The course also approaches several language, structure, style, and content issues that you can encounter while reporting the results of your research....

Top-Bewertungen

EP

Nov 12, 2019

This course is a great gateway to the world of technical writing. A good effort by the trainers and curriculum creators at familiarising the learner with the basics, nuances and the requisites.

IH

Jul 26, 2017

This course was a great opportunity to learn the pros and cons of technical writing. It was such an informative, interesting and enlightening learning experience.

Filtern nach:

26 - 31 von 31 Bewertungen für Technical Writing

von Mohammed A J

Sep 18, 2017

Great course and got great insights about Technical Writing. Adding some Technical Writing Tools would have been even nicer. Thanks

von BIBIN V

Jan 21, 2019

Very good course. Subject is very interesting. Some time there found some error on mobile application.

von Bogdan-Sebastian B

Feb 26, 2019

Information needs a little more work. So do the tests!

von Diana

Feb 20, 2019

It's nice and concise. I like it!

von Lee A B

Apr 26, 2019

Needs to be updated, tests answers don't match material.

von Alice B

Mar 22, 2020

Most questions in the tests were phrased very poorly, to the extent that, despite having thoroughly followed the lessons and taken notes, I had to do a lot of guesswork. Many things were explained as absolute truths when it's obvious that they could change depending on the type of technical document one is writing.

Moreover, the course is really hard to follow. The presentation is unengaging and the speaker's pronunciation is not the clearest. In a course that preaches conciseness and clarity, you'd expect these qualities to be reflected in the way materials are presented. It is not the case.

To conclude on a positive note, there are some solid learnings to be taken home, if you are patient enough to look for them.