[MUSIC] Okay, now we have discussed the deletion. And now there are mutants which do revert. The mutants which do revert, have this very clear property that is completely distinct from the deletion. And they are now called point mutation. But they don't revert all with the same efficiency. And actually, there is a factor of almost 1,000. Between the least stable mutant and the most stable point mutant. Stability is an intrinsic property of the mutation. This is very hard to explain, in terms of the Watson-Crick model, where all base pairs are equivalent. Some errors are there to stay for many, many generations. And some are less. And we'll come back to that later on. Benzer, noticed, with a very small number of mutants, about ten mutant in the first series, that reversion frequency has no correlation to the map. It's not that the mutants at the beginning revert easily or with more difficulty. You have a mutant that reverts, not doesn't revert. Revert a lot, doesn't. They're all interspersed. It's a property of the sequence of the DNA, not on the position. The third criterium that Benzer used. Which is a criterium, that most people in the textbooks ignore. But which is a very profound notion. How do you know, when you enact, when you mutate the gene how much activity is left? This is a very sophisticated question. Because of course, if you take the entire and burn it. It's all gone. But imagine there is a page missing. Can you think about the page? Can you reconstruct the page? Maybe, but quite difficult. However, there is a word missing. All of us can usually reconstruct. If I say, I love you, and I forgot the you. And I'm with a single person. It's pretty clear, that you don't love oysters, but that person. So the you is missing, but you can live without. But if you say to somebody, I, you, then you cannot judge because the word is more important. The verb is more important. I love you. I desire you. I hate you. I ignore you. I mean there are lots and lots and lots of possibilities. So not all the words, in a sentence, or in a paragraph have the same weight. And it's the same thing with genes, not all the parts of the gene have the same importance. We've seen in the first class, that gene code for enzymes, and enzymes are proteins, most enzymes are proteins. Sometimes you can change a piece of a protein. And the protein still has some residual activity, more or less. But you have to evaluate that. And I will give you an example taken from history, which is a very simple example. You know that all of us have a protein in our blood that is called factor VIII. And that is important for clotting. Now had no factor VIII, because he had inherited an X chromosome from the Queen Victoria family that was lacking factor VIII, and he had no factor VIII. And he was sick. But his mother, who'd given him one of the bad X chromosomes, was perfectly healthy, she could clot absolutely normally. So you know, that 50% of factor VIII is enough to make you clot, when you need to clot. 0 is not enough. So you know that for factor VIII, if you have 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 50%, you're okay. And at some point between 50 and 0 you become sick. So this is a very simple notion. And it's very important, because it's in genetic, when you make a mutant, what you see is a phenotype. And the phenotype is, in the case of the R2 mutants, doesn't grow kalime. So Benzer had no way of measuring the antimatic activity of the R2 protein. But he devised a system to rank the mutants as strong or weak mutants. The weak mutants, he called them leaky, because they are low sufficient something, for some phage production to occur, some of the biological phenomenon to occur. The tight mutants, the non-leaky mutants, nothing happens. And so, he devised a way to estimate this efficiency. The way he used was called transmission coefficient. Basically what he did is infect the E. coli K12 langerin cells with phage. And then plated these cells on the load of E. coli B. So any cell, any infected cell, that would produce one phage, will give rise to one plaque. If a cell is producing two phage, it also gives rise to a plaque. Ten phages also gives rise to a plaque. So you cannot evaluate above one. But below one you can. And so you can measure, are these mutants tight, or leaky? And for instance, with one of the mutants he got 0.03% transmission. 3 in 10,000 infected bacteria will make at least one. Before others he got up to .91. Almost every infected bacteria will make on phage. But this is not enough to give you a plaque on k lambda. Because one phage, plus one phage, plus one phage, plus one phage doesn't work. You don't get a plaque. A plaque is a exponential growth of it. So Benzer's first paper had three items, residual function, map position, and reversion property. That would define each. He also had in his first 1955 paper, the first notion of making, defining what is not a gene, but what is a functional unit. Today we call it a functional unit of gene. What he did was the following experiment. He showed that there is something called, that other people had called, psuedo-alleles at the time. Which basically means that you can have more than one mutation in a single gene. What Benzer defined was something called the position effect. And he wanted to define the functional units, today we would call the gene, he called them the cis-trans. Because, he said, he observed very quickly that if you infect a bacterium, a bacterium with a y-type phage and a mutant, so this is the y-type, and this is the rII mutant, you get production. That means this is like making a diploid. That means the mutant in recessive to the [INAUDIBLE]. We go back to the old Mendel term. All the mutants that were isolated so far in the R2 region are recessive. He presumed, that this infection, which he had not done, would also be active. In this case, you put the same mutation, the two mutations on the same chromosome. So then he asked, I can do something very easy, if I take one mutation, one mutant phase that is missing enzyme A, and one mutant phase that is missing enzyme B. If I put them together, can I get activity? Now this is like in the Bible, you have the cripple and the blind. The cripple can not walk but can see. The blind can not see but can walk. So if the blind carries the cripple, and the cripple tells the blind where to go, they are afunctional unit, exactly what Benzer set up to do. He took mutants, put them together in the same bacterium, and asked do I get progeny or do I not get progeny? The bacterium in that case being a k lambda bacterium. If the two mutants effect the same gene, doesn't work. If you are a mechanic, and you have a garage, and you have one car that has no carburetor, and one car that has no pump. You can take the pump from one, take the. And make one engine that works. This is called complementation. But if the two cars have a defective carburetor, you can not reconstruct, well you can maybe cut the carburetor in pieces. But let's assume the carburetor is non-cuttable. You cannot cut the carburetor, you cannot make the car. This is what happens in this case, inactive, no production. Inactive, no production. However, when he had mutants from the left part, and mutant from the right part, we got activity. In the 1959 paper, he called this test the CIS-TRANS test. The CIS test is the active, because the two mutations are recessive. And in the trans test, the answer will be yes if the mutations are in separate genes. No, if the mutations are in the same gene. So that was already in the 1955 paper. And the map location and the functional did correlate. There was a limit in the middle of the locus, everybody on the left belongs to the A functional unit. Everybody to the right, belongs to the B functional unit.