Very interesting and challenging. I need to spend a lot of time on the reading assignment, but I enjoyed the reading very much.

Very straightforward course. The professor explains things well, and I found this a very good intro to ancient philosophy.

Good course. Wish I could access comments from peer review or continue to access the course itself.

...excellent course for beginners but also for advanced - you will get always a new point of view.

I loved it. I give four stars only because I think that presential courses are better.

A good introduction to Ancient Greek Philosophy, though not as in depth as it could be

I think it was an enriching course. Though not many other students to engage with.

everything is fine but the music before each lecture is so loud and annoying

Maybe a little boring at the end but I very enjoyed the final task !

Very interesting , well designed and presented, introductory course

Great course, interesting topics and explanations, thanks !

Very interesting but some parts too solid.

Many Thanks.

Loved the way Dr Susan's way of explaining.

Very interesting and well structure course.

Good background for further exploration.

Good overview of these philosophers.

Interesting material well presented.

Clear and insightful explanation.

quick

Good

This course covers a lot of very interesting material and is presented in a calm, clear, organized manner. I thought the selected materials were well-chosen and presented in a way that captured the most important ideas of the philosophers discussed. I would not recommend this course to anyone with any formal background in philosophy, as the pace is somewhat slow, and the course spends a lot of time covering some basics of philosophy. (This may be an unfair critique, since I covered this material in college. I was drawn to this course as a refresher, but also hoping to learn something new or gain a new perspective on material I had already read. Rather, this is very much an introductory survey.) As a technical issue, I did not like the "pop quizzes" interspersed into the videos. These were annoying, breaking up the flow of the lecture merely to reiterate basic points. These interruptions added no value. I also disliked the introduction to each video: while it was well-produced, it was repetitive. The into music should be only on the first video, or, at most, on the first video of every section. Not each and every video. It may seem like a little thing, but each video is short, which means you're listening to the same musical into every 5 minutes or so. This is maddening. I skipped over it, but I'd prefer if the videos were edited in a way that acknowledges that people will likely be "binge watching" these, and formatted to flow one into the other seamlessly.

The content of the course is quite striking since this knowledge is not found everywhere, free and especially taught by a connoisseur. However, the videos are quite tedious since, in my opinion, the voice and tone of the teacher comes a time when it does not transmit energy and therefore is tedious, especially because they could help her with images, examples, animations etc. that could be more interesting and even more striking.

The course material is OK; the lectures are fun and interesting, but to pass the course you need to submit an assignment that is subjected to peer review and you will need to get approval by all of your peers. However the act of subscribing to a MOOC alone does not make people suited to review other peoples work...

The professor is animated and clearly loves her subject. I don't think we need to stop so frequently to ask a quiz question though. It's best to keep going on one subject without interruption.

Content is interesting but the teaching style could be more engaging