Kursteilnehmer-Bewertung und -Feedback für Understanding Research Methods von University of London
Über den Kurs
Top-Bewertungen
This is wonderful course especially for research scholars, one suggestion is instead of giving articles from books, please provide a PPT which will be more effective ! thank you for wonderful session.
very good course. The last e-activity was proposal preparation. It will be good if they add something about sampling in reading materials. Very good experience for me.....I will recommend this course
1626 - 1650 von 1,669 Bewertungen für Understanding Research Methods
von Enrico P
•Pretty shallow content, not really going in depth on anything. Parts of videos are repeated multiple times for no apparent reason. Errors in the wording of weekly tasks has existed seemingly for years and no effort has been put in solving the issues. I have paid for a certificate and earned it, and I do not think I am going to even download it.
von Juan C V G
•Podria tener un enfoque mas amplio. Ya que solo se centra en investigacion en el are social. No abarca investigacion cientifica o de otrras ramas del cobnocimiento. Pudieron convocar expertos en estas areas para asie rniquecer en gran medida el proceso de aprendizaje, y hacer de este un curso mas global.
von Gunnar W
•Could be made much more interactive, interesting and challenging. It raises four important topics and the methodology is interesting, but the evaluation for students is so relaxed it does not invite engagement or further ellaboration.
von Nidhi R
•This course relies heavily on self-reading and theoretical knowledge. Video interviews which are part of the curriculum are mostly not useful. Overall the course did not provide me with the value I was looking for.
von Mansi
•Overall, the e-tivities or tasks given are good. However, the videos and courses don't add a lot of contribution to what is known. It is very basic and very less inputs are provided during the course.
von Abhishekkumar T
•This course just gives you theoretical background of research methods and too easy. I found it actually not useful to me. I learned no practical skills to deal with my research thesis.
von Zebun N A
•The content of the course was very minimal. Much needs to be put into such a course to inspire research attitudes - and probably more outputs should be demanded from the learners too.
von Katharhy G
•I expected more instruction of getting a research project started. The course was mainly to introduce different aspects of general ideas of why research is a good idea.
von Sayr E O O
•The sound is not clear, they bore me a lot when they talk about something. I would enjoy the course if they type it in a page to read it more comfortably.
von Christopher M S
•There was very little actual content in this course, and I can't say I learned very much. In hindsight, I wish I hadn't paid for a verified certificate.
von Ahmed E
•This is a good course but I was hoping to get lectures that teach the research methodology in greater details with MCQs as testing methods.
von Akshay T
•Not at all recommended. I would prefer rather book like Craft of research or a similar one instead of this course.
von Oosman B
•Contains worthwhile content though for all the hours spent, I didn't get as much as I should have.
von Abdulrahman A
•The course is not well constricted to guide students.. it's only fill the gaps.
von Rawan N A
•thank you for your efforts but I think need more information
von Biobele L
•It was a great and enlightening course. I was so excited
von Carlos M C C
•Poor sound, low quality videos. Low engagement.
von Saquib B H
•The contents could have been better.
von Rawan I B H
•Not adding any valuable information
von Sintra S
•Not really detailed
von Xavier O
•yeah
von david w
•Peer reviewing quality was very poor, and I didn't receive any feedback that I could learn from. There was a mismatch between the simplicity of the points in the videos and the complexity of the readings, and there was no assistance with the reading, e.g. supporting notes or videos discussing the readings. The discussion facility was not used for any actual discussion of the material, but was filled with requests for peer reviewing including at least one that said 'I'll give you a good mark if you give me one'.
The useful aspect was completing the assignments, which made me watch the videos and read the sources, but, as I say, there was no subsequent useful feedback.
von aastha s
•This course is not what it boasts to be.Just some random interviews are posted without doing any work on developing the content and structuring the presentation.Pier review system even makes it worse.I was expecting a more structured presentation rather than beating around the bush.Rather than giving reference to the materials you can make some efforts to create content of your own.If you are looking for course on research methods the course by university of Amsterdam is the best hands down.
von Zafar A
•The course could be done much better. It is basically people being interviewed about what research is and they ask the same questions to 4 different people with similar answers. Also the course organisers get u the paying customer to review as oppose to do it themselves -I think this is not fair and u get no input from the course organiser. How this course got an award is beyond me. Coursea should remove this course or get new people to do it properly.
von Manuel S
•It is a really basic course. I don't recommend it because the videos are not well organized and the assignments are not clear. It also demands to give feedback with at least 50 words, this is not applicable to submissions that require a minimun of 400 words but participants dont take the course seriously and write a copuple of lines. Also, the interviews from the videos are not well organized and the people interviewed dont always make a good point.
Coursera Footer
