Chevron Left
Zurück zu Softwareprozesse und agile Praktiken

Bewertung und Feedback des Lernenden für Softwareprozesse und agile Praktiken von University of Alberta

5,001 Bewertungen

Über den Kurs

This course delves into a variety of processes to structure software development. It also covers the foundations of core Agile practices, such as Extreme Programming and Scrum....



11. Aug. 2017

I had read about the different agiles methodologies out there but It was until I took this course that I could "digest" them and internalize how to chose the right one for me and how to apply them.


5. Feb. 2016

What other way to learn and understand Software Processes and Agile Practices than to register to Software Product Management at the University of Alberta, Canada.

I rate the course 5 star.

Filtern nach:

776 - 800 von 811 Bewertungen für Softwareprozesse und agile Praktiken

von Don L

19. Juli 2020

Audio was poor throughout the course. The instructors all sounded like goats! Not sure if this was due to my HW or the course HW/SW. I have not experienced this issue with other courses offered from other educational institutions.

Course content was great!

von Loïc H

5. Feb. 2020

Overall is good. But it feels a bit out dated. Feature Driven Develoment is now very popular in Product Management. Maybe you should explore the Agile Methodology

von Ayush B

15. Jan. 2016

The lectures were done well. The tests should have more "Real world scenario" questions, then just asking about specifics terms used in a given process

von Yvonne G

9. Sep. 2019

course content is good. but i feel like the instructors are just reading the material..i can finish the course by just reading material...

von Joanna K

14. Juli 2019

Although the information is useful, it would have been better with a bit more interaction, rather than just doing a quiz here and there

von Alberto G G

17. Jan. 2016

Interesting review of many of the theoretical aspects. It completely lacks practice though. No exercises, no real world scenarios...

von Siham A

6. März 2018

This course was filled with jargon and definitions. I enjoyed agile topics and specifically scrum and kanban introductions.

von Oscar Z J

13. Okt. 2020

Visual resources to support course explanations are lacking. The course is good as an introductory course

von Victor U

21. Feb. 2017

knowledge-based, no skill-based work at all which is weird since the capstone is skills-based

von Pavel B

4. Jan. 2018

introductory material. going through the pdf doc sufficiently represents the whole course.

von Gresa K B

13. Aug. 2017

Interesting course but sadly presented in a not very exciting and modern way.

von michael s

5. März 2016

It was good but so introductory

Instructors just reading the documents

von Maqbool K

13. Nov. 2016

Course is awesome but the final 36 questions are really a headache.

von Shaikha A

6. Sep. 2017

lot of information I have to know I forgot some of it

von Samantha R

21. Juni 2020

The course is no up to date¡ resources are from 2016

von Mylène R

8. Feb. 2016

Could be more in-depth (e.g.Kanban part...)

von H M I

24. Juli 2020

Nice and educative course for beginners.

von mohamed e

24. Apr. 2020

too much academia no real experience

von Virginia C P

23. Nov. 2021

I think the course was good

von Dirk S

2. März 2020

Could be better presented.

von Sabrine R

1. Juni 2020

difficult course



6. Mai 2022

Too much theory.


8. Juni 2020


von sandeep s

5. Mai 2020


von Carlos M B

29. Nov. 2016

The scope of the course is interesting, the objective is ambitious and the structure is fine, but the contents and quizzes are very often off-point. A specialist should go critically through the scripts and make a thorough review of the contents. Affirmations are most times not justified at all ("incremental prototyping will yield a feature-rich and robust software"). The quizzes some times ask about things which have nothing to do with what was explained before. The contents about SCRUM are presented eight times partially through the introduction and here. I know it takes a lot of time to prepare this material, but clearly that last effort for quality was not done.