Bewertung und Feedback des Lernenden für Softwareprozesse und agile Praktiken von University of Alberta
Über den Kurs
Top-Bewertungen
KC
11. Aug. 2017
I had read about the different agiles methodologies out there but It was until I took this course that I could "digest" them and internalize how to chose the right one for me and how to apply them.
JO
5. Feb. 2016
What other way to learn and understand Software Processes and Agile Practices than to register to Software Product Management at the University of Alberta, Canada.
I rate the course 5 star.
776 - 800 von 811 Bewertungen für Softwareprozesse und agile Praktiken
von Don L
•19. Juli 2020
Audio was poor throughout the course. The instructors all sounded like goats! Not sure if this was due to my HW or the course HW/SW. I have not experienced this issue with other courses offered from other educational institutions.
Course content was great!
von Loïc H
•5. Feb. 2020
Overall is good. But it feels a bit out dated. Feature Driven Develoment is now very popular in Product Management. Maybe you should explore the Agile Methodology
von Ayush B
•15. Jan. 2016
The lectures were done well. The tests should have more "Real world scenario" questions, then just asking about specifics terms used in a given process
von Yvonne G
•9. Sep. 2019
course content is good. but i feel like the instructors are just reading the material..i can finish the course by just reading material...
von Joanna K
•14. Juli 2019
Although the information is useful, it would have been better with a bit more interaction, rather than just doing a quiz here and there
von Alberto G G
•17. Jan. 2016
Interesting review of many of the theoretical aspects. It completely lacks practice though. No exercises, no real world scenarios...
von Siham A
•6. März 2018
This course was filled with jargon and definitions. I enjoyed agile topics and specifically scrum and kanban introductions.
von Oscar Z J
•13. Okt. 2020
Visual resources to support course explanations are lacking. The course is good as an introductory course
von Victor U
•21. Feb. 2017
knowledge-based, no skill-based work at all which is weird since the capstone is skills-based
von Pavel B
•4. Jan. 2018
introductory material. going through the pdf doc sufficiently represents the whole course.
von Gresa K B
•13. Aug. 2017
Interesting course but sadly presented in a not very exciting and modern way.
von michael s
•5. März 2016
It was good but so introductory
Instructors just reading the documents
von Maqbool K
•13. Nov. 2016
Course is awesome but the final 36 questions are really a headache.
von Shaikha A
•6. Sep. 2017
lot of information I have to know I forgot some of it
von Samantha R
•21. Juni 2020
The course is no up to date¡ resources are from 2016
von Mylène R
•8. Feb. 2016
Could be more in-depth (e.g.Kanban part...)
von H M I
•24. Juli 2020
Nice and educative course for beginners.
von mohamed e
•24. Apr. 2020
too much academia no real experience
von Virginia C P
•23. Nov. 2021
I think the course was good
von Dirk S
•2. März 2020
Could be better presented.
von Sabrine R
•1. Juni 2020
difficult course
long
von KHALID I A
•6. Mai 2022
Too much theory.
von PAVITHRA H
•8. Juni 2020
good
von sandeep s
•5. Mai 2020
none
von Carlos M B
•29. Nov. 2016
The scope of the course is interesting, the objective is ambitious and the structure is fine, but the contents and quizzes are very often off-point. A specialist should go critically through the scripts and make a thorough review of the contents. Affirmations are most times not justified at all ("incremental prototyping will yield a feature-rich and robust software"). The quizzes some times ask about things which have nothing to do with what was explained before. The contents about SCRUM are presented eight times partially through the introduction and here. I know it takes a lot of time to prepare this material, but clearly that last effort for quality was not done.
Coursera Footer
