Jul 13, 2020
Solid course that dives deeper into the fundamentals of CS. Great instruction, attention to detail and the excercises are adequately challenging for beginners and lower-intermediate programmers.
May 22, 2020
Great instructors, liked the way they reinforced concepts through quizzes during lecture. Also appreciated and enjoyed the content of the lectures as well as the project assignments.
von Thuan M•
Oct 26, 2017
As a follow-up course to The University of Toronto's Fundamentals of Programming, this course is a natural progression. As a second-level course, more is expected of the learner. The challenges offered by the instructors are more rigorous than an intro course. The quizzes can be tricky as well, so for someone seeing the material for the first time, these questions will require insight and thought to come up with the solution. Jennifer Campbell and Paul Gries are good instructors who try to emphasis the importance of the process of a programmer. The course structure itself does not seem to follow one another week to week and seems to be extra topics in programming not covered in Fundamentals. The course covers doctest and unittest, classes, search and sorting algorithms, object-oriented programming, and exceptions. The topics on classes and object-oriented programming are excellent and recommended to truly have a grasp of Python.
von Abhishek S•
Jul 02, 2017
This course primarily focuses on best practices for writing programs(in python). One also gets to learn basic sorting and searching algorithms. It briefly touches upon the concepts of classes, exceptions etc. Along the journey you'll also learn some tricks with python. Overall it was a fantastic experience. I hope UofT comes out with a third course in this series - Learn to Program which will go into much more detail especially in concepts such as object oriented programming, exception handling etc.
von Ard S•
Mar 15, 2019
This strengths of this course were also it weaknesses; while I enjoyed this course more than the first one due to the introduction of a wider variety of topics (basic algorithms, OOP, etcetera) it also felt less coherent in its approach in the sense that I missed an overarching concept or arc that tied all the modules together, which IMO is where the first module shined. Interesting and educative nevertheless.
von Oliver F•
Sep 20, 2017
It's a nice course with good videos. Since it's very basic, anyone with little programming experience should be able to pass this course. Even without any knowledge of Python, the course is manageable.
To improve the videos, I'd recommend to adjust the audio levels, since some parts are spoken louder than others. Nevertheless, I've been able to understand everything.
von Ikseon K•
Feb 01, 2018
Thanks to lecturer's clear and easy explanation, I completed this coursework after LTP1, Learn to Program: Fundamentals. I really appreciate it for two great teachers' enthusiasm and kindness. Throughout this coursework, I can find the big picture of Python programming world. Thanks! Also, hope anybody else will enjoy the programming through this great coursework!
von Zzm S•
Sep 28, 2018
Topics are well chosen. I think the content is practical and not superficial for work. I appreciate the instructors' work. They are very clear and logic is easy to follow. I would suggest there to be more code assignment for practice. I personally think the content is good but not enough. This course is more like a 3 -week course.
von Alberto P•
Sep 09, 2018
The course was great, I enjoyed it less than the first part though. I feel there was way more support from the mentors and the forums in the first part, whereas in this edition there was almost nobody posting around and helping. Still, as the other one great teaching from both professors and great content. Thank you!
von Irina K•
Mar 24, 2017
Quite simple course for those, who has already learned some python, but has some drawbacks in knowledge of unit testing, exceptions and classes. All examples are understandable and simple.
Although expected more about quality code crafting, some hints and best practices, that could help in real life of the developer.
von Li H Y•
Jun 27, 2017
Overall it is a very great course. The material is well-structured and worth to learn.
This course worth 4 stars but not 5 because the instructors seldom answer questions in the forum. Fellow students need to help each other and sometimes there is no help from everyone.
von Greg D•
Jul 01, 2020
Mostly accurate per overview.
Using versions of Python no longer supported to auto-mark submissions, should be updated.
Otherwise, rigorous detail for the quality of crafting code.
von Branimir L•
Apr 09, 2017
It does not fulfills completely its title 'Crafting Quality Code'. Nevertheless, it does pay attention to unit testing and taking care of the design via design recipes.
von Christian B M•
Mar 20, 2017
Good course, especially the doc and unit testing parts. I had hoped for a more advanced implementations, but thank you for mentioning the exec function.
von Alejandro G Z•
May 27, 2020
Very helpful concepts, clearly and thoroughly explained. I found the Testing chapter especially useful. Thanks!
von David A G•
Jul 21, 2020
Si completaste Learn to Program: The Fundamentals, recomiendo que sigas aprendiendo con este curso.
von vlady N•
Jun 16, 2020
The end Assignment has been lacking instructions for an end-to-end testing and local implementation
von Emil L•
Jul 17, 2020
Very well structured. Good quiz and assignments. Builds a solid foundation.
von Tyson C•
Jun 13, 2017
Look like not many people around, no one do peer review for my assignment
von jbene m•
Aug 21, 2019
Very practical. I have learned a lot from this course.
von Ashwani k G•
Apr 28, 2017
Wonderful course. Got to learn many things.
von Benoit I•
Mar 26, 2017
Very interresting course for Python lovers.
von HU X•
Jun 12, 2017
very basic stuff and very easy.
Sep 29, 2018
von Seha I O•
Jan 26, 2018
von Rey O•
Jul 01, 2017
It would've been better that these very long read exercises be put into a programming exercise. Being presented with a couple of correct answers (but inefficient) takes a lot of time for us to figure it out. If you guys really insist on this kind of exercises, it's better to give us 3 or maybe 4 correct answers and we choose what we think is the most efficient one. That way, if we got the wrong answer, it's our job as why our chosen answer is not the most efficient one.
von Viktoriia T•
Apr 29, 2020
I took The fundamental course by the same lectors, and it was really nice. So I decided to proceed to the next course, that they have. But, it was not so good as the previous one.
It is no mentor on this course, so you will not get any support, if you will get some questions.
Also, materials in week 4 presented in bad quality. It is too fast and not clear at all.