Bewertung und Feedback des Lernenden für Programming Languages, Part A von University of Washington
Über den Kurs
Top-Bewertungen
YZ
2. Dez. 2016
I'm just a beginner for CS or SE classes, and find this course really concise and challenging. It opens a door for me to get deeper into programming language. No wonder it got so high average score.
VA
4. März 2018
Very interesting course! Superb teaching and homework assignments. If you are interested in functional programming or in programming languages in general, this should be one of the must take MOOCs
451 - 475 von 493 Bewertungen für Programming Languages, Part A
von can e
•26. Feb. 2017
excellent
von rocklct
•6. Okt. 2016
very good
von Caifa L
•23. Sep. 2016
更好的了解程序语言
von Paulo S
•8. Aug. 2016
The best!
von Amanda H L d A
•26. Okt. 2021
Amazing!
von Anderson R
•2. Okt. 2016
Awesome!
von Junlin G
•17. Sep. 2018
Love it
von ttttttttttttttttttttttt<>"
•9. Apr. 2018
Amazing
von 刘洋
•9. Mai 2017
编程神课！！！
von gagandeep s
•14. Nov. 2021
awesum
von Mohammed S
•29. Sep. 2020
thanks
von Tacinight
•25. Mai 2018
Great!
von 徐承恩
•22. Dez. 2017
G
r
e
a
t!
von liruidong
•17. März 2018
great
von 肖守冬
•7. Mai 2017
great
von Manjit K
•2. Juli 2022
Nice
von tran h
•8. Juni 2022
good
von Nguyen D V
•6. Juni 2022
good
von 陈放
•22. Juni 2019
好的不行
von Mike
•26. März 2019
Good
von Hugsy W
•23. Okt. 2017
good
von Héctor B A
•1. Sep. 2016
Great course overall. It focuses on functional programming concepts like immutability, locally-defined functions, pattern-matching and forces the user to use recursion, taking you out of your for-loop comfort zone. In my humble opinion, maybe the time spent in learning the SML language, which is not the main goal of the course, takes a bit too long, but on the other hand I guess that can't really be helped. Videos are grate and grading procedures are pretty fair. Mind you, the course is fairly time-consuming.
von Lorenzo B
•13. Juni 2020
Four stars because for me at least one of the most interesting parts about the course it the comparisons that happen LATER in part B and C, between oop/fp and especially static/dynamic typing; that is, I treat this course as a test to see if you're interested in the whole thing (I am). Otherwise a solid 5/5. Also I personally found that polyml often gives clearer diagnostics than sml/nj, but your mileage may vary here. AND it's my first course here :=)
von Scott v K
•8. Jan. 2017
The constructs of learning functional programming are very useful and well explained. This course is about theory with practice problems which are somewhat challenging using SML as the programming language. The only downside of the course is the use of SML, which is fine for educational purposes, but lacks any real development / debugging frameworks and has no commercial usability beyond learning the concepts in the course.
Coursera Footer
