IJ
22. Juli 2020
Dr. Matthew Yee-King is a good teacher. Although the course is hard because of lots of coding, he makes it easy to understand all lessons.\n\nA good course and a good learning experience, indeed.
KK
1. Okt. 2017
manipulate application with multiple users is a really useful technical skills we should get, these courses contain how to add multiple users/documents/comments, that's really need to learn!
von Carlos L
•6. Apr. 2019
Non of the courses teaches you how to host your meteor app nor the limitations of it, I think this is very important and it's not mentioned anywhere!
von Frederic H
•27. Nov. 2016
Very good introduction to Meteor. Should be updated to newer Meteor version, lots of things have changed in the official guidelines in the meantime.
von Dana N
•14. Aug. 2016
This was informative, but there were some issues with the final project that could have used some more guidance.
von Pushan P
•30. Juni 2020
The course was nice and the assignments were good. Although most of work was already done in assignments
von Karl S
•24. Juni 2016
The final project for this one was difficult but within reason, as it should be.
von Cristian C B
•14. Feb. 2016
Es bueno pero hace falta enfocarlo mas en temas especificos
von Sergej V
•27. Dez. 2015
Enjoying it, but missed out a bit before...
von Francisco J F A
•26. Feb. 2016
Great course!! It's really useful.
von Steve M
•20. Nov. 2020
Thanks for the awesome course!
von Thelemaque D
•12. Jan. 2016
Great cours !
von Nicola R A
•12. Jan. 2016
Great Course
von Alejandro
•19. Dez. 2015
great
von Ioannis G
•26. März 2016
I would prefer if the course lasted 6 weeks so we can get a better understanding in theory and practice every single bit of the code. It was a nice ride in general and I liked it. The last exercise was hard, it could have been a little easier.
von Eleonora R
•14. Sep. 2018
Very well explained (really love the teacher!) however some of the functionalities do not work with recent version of the framework, making it very slow and difficult to follow the course through.
von lyheng
•19. Feb. 2017
The previous 3 courses was pretty good, but the assignment is tooooooooo easy, and this course has lot of redundancy, which i think it is not necessary, but overall, i think it is good
von Lucas E S
•14. Okt. 2017
Needs an update since meteor.js changed a lot since the course was developed
von Victor W
•17. Sep. 2018
exercise made so easy
von Name
•16. Feb. 2017
.
von Arthur K
•26. Feb. 2016
Only one assignment at the end, so you go through 3 weeks before being asked to code (this seems like a big mistake for any programming course). The final assignment gives you a largely complete project and just asks you to make a few changes. You can't put that as a project on a resume, because you're doing 5% of the work with your hand held through it.
Worst of all, the code given to you does not adhere to JavaScript best practices, like local variables not being declared (so that they become global variables, a big no-no), spacing being all over the place, etc. JavaScript has a bad reputation, and sloppy teaching with respect to best practices is very bad.
von Eduardo M T
•1. Nov. 2016
Course is good, the reason I'm giving it a low rating is because it's a little redundant with course 3 "Introduction to Meteor.js Development". Some of the features covered in this course I researched on my own to create the final development project in Course 3. So no much value for me here.
von Krzysztof B
•31. Jan. 2016
Review of documentation from meteorjs website.
Slow and boring course.
Last assignment is where something starts to be moving but that's the end of course :(
You could dive deep into Subscribe/Publish, what is below meteor(node.js) etc.
von Gonzagues J
•1. Feb. 2016
This course was too repetitive compare to the previous course in the specialization.
von Christopher B
•26. Juli 2017
I worked very hard to overcome all of the obstacles in this module and the preceding one (Intro to Meteor). I've really enjoyed the format and instructors, but these recent modules feature a spectrum of difficulties brought on by the dated nature of the module, and a sudden disconnect between the practice material and the knowledge expected in the review exercises. Every week was another mess to dig out of without knowing how to dig or being able to find useful resources for the unique issues. Solutions were usually lucked into rather than understood. I've been a good sport about putting the work in and taking it as-is because it probably reflects some of the challenges of being in the field, but I've finally broken - why is this course such a neckache? I love it other than the pain, confusion, and random broken parts every week.
von Chantal
•18. Okt. 2021
The course is outdated, errors occur when loading the docs. You have to find out for yourself on the internet how to fix the errors. Waste of money, waste of time
von George T
•29. Apr. 2016
Outdated course that needs a lot of changes to your code and in releases so you can follow professors code.A lot of people had same issues.