Excellent course. Great instructor. Dives right into computer science fundamentals to fully explain the concepts. Good programming assignments. Only thing left to include concurrent design patterns .
von Leam H•
Needs more TA and instructor interaction. Lots of outside reading required, but over all a good introduction. You really need to have decent programming skills before attempting this.
von Akashdeep D•
could be better. there's a lot of concepts here and UCI condensed a lot of it into a few videos per week. more assignments with clearer docstrings would be more helpful
von Luis R A S•
Excelent course, I've encountered many problems, but the people who were taken the course at the same time helped me a lot, Use the discussion forums!
von Olaf D•
Overall I enjoyed the course but there were a bunch of inconsistencies which where confusing at times.
von Niall D•
1 star lost because week 1 is unnecessary. Cool course, as it is easy to do in a week.
von Juan C•
There are some errors on tests that have been flagged and haven't been fixed.
von Sebastian R•
Much better when video is chopped up. Easier for microlearning sessions :)
von Amiya M•
I guess a final project should be their to develop then it would be great
von Hongyi L•
I hope there will be a TA in future. The class is great enough.
von Hesham E•
Perfect course, with mix of theory and practical examples.
von Soham D•
Practical session should be encouraged more
von subrata d•
It's really a good course.
von Michael S•
The course material was very good, and the presenter did an excellent job. I was especially impressed that he gave background conceptual understanding, not just language syntax elements. Slides were pretty good, sometimes very good. But the web site was a mess! At the end, I waited four days (impatiently) for a dining philosophers project to be available for me to grade, so I could finish the course. It never showed up. Finally I went to the forums and responded to someone's request that I review his assignment, and that allowed me to complete the course. There was nothing, nothing in the course anywhere, to tell me that this was either possible or necessary. Why did the web site not give me an assignment to grade when there were multiple students begging to have their assignments graded in the forums? And do course assistants ever respond to forum posts? Very, very bad technical execution of the course.
von Alexander K•
In formation is useful but assignments are not clear enough, module 2 propose to reproduce raise condition however threads in Go are not explained yet. Module 4 assignment is quite tricky and gives big possibility to be blocked during review because requirements are not clear.
von Amit S•
Content was rushed very quickly. First week content was bit stretched. Although the content was relevant but stretched. Rather reading from slides, content could have being more interactive.
von Robert M•
The class goes in sufficient details through the go concurrency features but more concrete examples would be useful to retain the material.
Too much details on concurrency basics, not suited for the ones with other programming language experience.
von Michael S•
Shabby and messy
von Max W•
Light on content, with an emphasis on the very basics of concurrency and Moore's law. I was hoping that an intermediate course would jump right into the Go concurrency concepts instead of spending half the course on remedial concurrency topics.
It may be that the course isn't very fully attended in June of 2021, but I was having a hard time getting folks to review my assignments and/or finding assignments to review (you must review at least one for yours to be graded).
von Daniel R•
The concepts in this course are critical for any Go developer to know. However the course itself contains all sorts of extraneous information and could easily be done in two modules instead of four. There are many more go topics that could be included in this class instead of wasting time talking about Moore's Law and repeating information.
von Tim W•
Content reasonably good. Some errors in quizes and assignments.
Assignments could use better descriptions and rubrics as often they did not test many of the features included in the assignment. Also one of the earlier assignments used knowledge that was not introduced until the following module.
von Peter M•
Why say something in once concise sentence when you can say it in hundreds of words? There is so much unnecessary waffling in all these Go courses.
Almost all of the first 2 'weeks' is not relevant to Go. Moore's law indeed! Why?
The lecturer loves the sound of his own voice.
von Gonzalo R•
The instructions for the assignments are too vague. First two lectures in week 1 are not specific about go.
von bob n•
Sloppy, babbling presentation. Multiple inexcusable typos in slides, trying to learn a new programming language/syntax when the presentation contains syntax errors is just plain wrong. Presenter is disorganized, ramble and runs off topic. First week has NOTHING to do with GO. Programming concepts needed to complete second assignment given IN THE FOLLOWING week. I'm so grateful there isn't a fourth course in this series, I could not take much more of "professor" Harris. He might be fun to share a beer with, but not as an instructor.
von Joey W•
I have loved the two previous Go courses, and been looking forward to getting to the course on concurrency. Unfortunately, this course embodies the very reasons I could not stand attending college. Right from the beginning, I had to sit through 39 minutes of lectures on a deep dive into topics that really are only relevant if I'm trying to specialize in hardware engineering. Now, I'm being asked to WRITE AN ESSAY covering those topics. I'm here to learn Go, not to dive into the hows and whats of modern CPU architecture.