It tackled just the surface of research and prototyping, nonetheless, a good course to start

There could have been more content and the course been more challenging, otherwise loved it!

Well paced and insightful, assignment instructions can be a little vague at times though.

Useful content and presentation, but I expected a bit more from prototyping.

The assignments for this course are more hands on than course 4

very difficult! requires high levels of intrinsic motivation

Helpful information, great examples and assignments.

I really like this course assignments.

Good course! Learned from others.

A very nice introduction to UX

The course is very good.

awesome tutorial

Excelente Curso

good learning

great course!

Good Course!

Great course

It was OK - like so many other courses in this specialisation it felt like a lot of common sense. I was able to complete the assignments with only minimal scans of the course material and pass all the quizzes without much of a challenge. I have worked in the industry for over a decade though... so may not be the typical student profile.

This was a kind of basic course without enough examples. That being said, the most interesting part of the course is prototyping section. I am looking forward to hearing more about that aspect of design.

Great video, they should be longer and more detailed though.

Some of the information about these topics were treated in a more detailed and useful way in the introductory course

In general it's really fun here but the assignments takes much more time than told and i wished

the focus would be more on layouting interfaces.

For some of the topics, the Introduction class has more meaningful homework projects. this felt a bit thin.

As a part of the whole Interaction Design Specialisation, I felt the material to be somewhat repetitive, and still, very superficial.

As a stand alone course, I think it covers a lot of material but very briefly, so it can't show any depth in it.

The Assignments were interesting, specially the last one, but I think it would have been better if they each build up on the last one. For example, the first one was to plan an interview and conduct a part of it about a certain topic, the last assignment was to read an interview conducted by someone else and analyse the information, it would have been much more interesting to complete our own interview and make an analysis on what we gathered. That way, the assignments wouldn't felt like two separate courses.

This course offers material that is redundant if you have taken the other courses in the specialization. As with other courses, assignments are not clearly defined and, more than the other courses, clear examples of concepts are missing. I really wish these later classes in the specialization would expand upon the concepts introduced in the first two courses and not regurgitate the same information. We need depth at this point, not a continuation of high-level, introductory material.

Assignments at times a bit hazy and there is very little guidance. In general the types of assignments do not lend themselves too well to peer review. This is far off the standard set by courses 1 and 2. Lectures seem a bit generic and although Liz Gerber tries to make it hands on, the subject matter really doesnt seem anywhere as tangible as when Klemmer presents it.